"Once you start a book, do
you feel compelled to finish it? If not, what causes you to put it down?"
- from Susan
If you
had asked me this question three or four years ago, I would have said, “Almost
nothing.” I felt I owed it to the writer, to my wallet from which the funds
came to buy it rather than some other book, to the principle of “waste not,
want not” to finish what I started, to eat everything on my plate.
But
having written four books and being in the thick of the fifth, I’ve lost a bit
of the sense of loyalty – duty? – and have learned more about what goes into a
good story, and how to spot something that’s just not taking off. I’m also a
few years older and have enough unread books to last me more than my allotted
years. So, if I get annoyed, confused, bored in the first 70-80 pages, I’m out.
I can
hear you: 80 pages? Way too long. Yes, but maybe the writer starts slowly and
is about to crack the story open on the next page. Maybe he redeems himself
with the next scene. Mostly, no, that doesn’t happen. What does happen is:
Four
female characters are introduced and they are all essentially the same – same
physical tics, same attitudes, same voices, same ages. By page 50 I can’t keep
Mary, Pat, Nancy, and Barbara (generic names too) apart and the author hasn’t
given me a solid reason to try.
The
first chapter takes place in Cleveland 2006, the second in Atlanta in 1873, the
third in Cleveland again but in 2000 and the time and place shifts are giving
me vertigo. It’s fair to time-shift and to place-shift but you’d better make
each place more distinctive than Southern accents and hoop skirts.
The plot is way too complicated and the more convoluted it
gets, the harder it is to maintain any momentum or focus. If I accepted the
main plot and the three sub plots, I promise I’ll close the book when, on page
80, the author drops in an entirely new problem that means new characters and
relationships and doesn’t seem to fit with what’s gone before.
The dialogue is not real and it doesn’t take me anywhere
within the story. Assume the writer speaks English as a first language. Assume
he or she lives in the real world and speaks to checkout clerks, dentists, and
other writers hanging out at bars during conventions. Why don’t his characters
talk like that? Why do her characters spend whole pages discussing how slow the
elevators are in speech patterns right out of 1940s propaganda films?
The harder I work to get these things right in my own books,
the more I have come to lose patience with books that can’t seem to pull it all
together. Even now, though, I feel as though I’m being harsh and snobby, and
that means I’ll probably assuage my guilt by sticking with the next
not-quite-ready-for-prime-time novel that comes my way. It’s hard to write a
good book, and I’m in awe of my colleagues who do it book after book after
book. Those are the ones I read – carefully – to see how to make my own next
book better.
4 comments:
I will admit, like you, Susan, that the after I started on this writing adventure I became more circumspect in my reading and will toss a book aside more readily than I did before. You've also made some good observations for us writers to pay attention to. Good post.
Film school kind ruined me for bad movies... And writing novels has made me a lot less tolerant of books that don't work for me as well. I want to make sure to use my reading time for great novels as well, Susan!
Robin, the person who needs most to pay attention to these things is me!
Meredith, I didn't know you went to film school. I will have to think of a CM question that will give you a chance to share what you learned.
Post a Comment