This week we are tackling the question of which path to
publication we would choose these days if we had just written our first novel. Terry Shames here, weighing in on this topic.
I’ve only been published for five years, so this was a
choice I actually had to make at the time I finished my first novel. I got an
agent for A Killing at Cotton Hill
right on the cusp of the indie publishing revolution, so I could have gone that
route. I considered it. I wrote out the pros and cons.
On the pro side, publishing your work independently means
that you have total control over your product—you can decide if you want an
e-book only, “e and tree,” print-on-demand, or a print run. Money is a big
deciding factor in the choice. The “e” side can be very low-budget, while a
print run can be really expensive. Whatever you decide, you get to choose when
the book is published, what the cover will look like, and what the production
values are. If you decide you aren’t
happy with the book, you can change anything from the cover to the title, to
the text itself in a few minutes. And unlike traditional publishing, your book
can be available forever. It has no shelf life.
A lot of people choose this way for reasons that work for
them. When I was waiting (endlessly) for my agent to find a publishing home for
my first book, I ran into a young woman who had just self-published her first
book. She said she didn’t want to be bothered by finding an agent and waiting
forever. She seemed quite confident in her ability to market. I don’t know how
it worked out for her, but I know several authors who have had great success
with publishing their own work. Like her, they were impatient with the long
(and very possibly fruitless) search for an agent and publisher.
There were numerous reason why I chose not to go indie. Some of them are no longer operational. The
biggest reason at the time, and one that has changed significantly, was that
self-published work got little respect. By now, there are a wide variety of
authors who have independently-published books, and they run the gamut from
really fine work to work that has been rushed to production and could have used
a strong editorial hand. Just like traditionally published books! Another big
drawback for me was that I knew publishing my own work meant learning a whole
new set of skills. Instead, I wanted someone else to get the ISBN, design a
cover, decide on the paper and printing, and do the necessary editing and
formatting.
The biggest hurdle for me, though, was that I had always
dreamed of being traditionally published, with an agent, an editor, and a
tangible product that I could hold in my hand. So I was willing to hold out for
that. In the end, it worked for me, but I know it doesn’t happen for everyone.
The one thing I haven’t mentioned is promoting and marketing
books. Although years ago, many publishers promoted their authors’ books, this
has changed. Now, unless you are a really big seller, you have to do most of the
promotion yourself regardless of whether you are traditionally or
indie-published. It’s hard, time-consuming work, but everyone has to do it if
they want their books to get an audience.
There is an additional reason that some people choose to
publish independently that wasn’t a big factor years ago. Publishers used to be
more loyal to their authors, and be willing to ride out a book that didn’t sell
as well as they hoped. These days, the bottom line has a huge impact on authors.
More than one author of highly popular books has been “orphaned” by a publisher
because their numbers aren’t good enough. An independently-published author
doesn’t have to worry about that.
Over the last several years independent publishing has
become easier. There are all kinds of support mechanisms to make the process easier;
everything from independent editors to cover designers to “small” publishers
who will partner with authors for a much smaller cut than traditional publishers
take.
The reasons I went with a traditional publisher are still
mostly in effect. I am very happy with my agent, who supports me the way I had
always dreamed an agent would. And I am happy with my publisher, Seventh Street
Books—with the look and feel of the books they publish and the authors they publish.
If I had a newly written book, I might be more impatient about finding an agent
and a publisher, but I’d still try that route first.
2 comments:
Interesting thoughts on traditional versus indie publishing, Terry.
Thanks, Dieter. I know indie authors who are doing really well, and others who struggle--and the same with traditional. It's a hard question.
Post a Comment