Q: Clichés in our fiction. Are they universalities worth exploring or simply lazy shortcuts?
- from Susan
Trope: a very predictable or unoriginal thing or person.
Cliché: a statement that is obviously true and says nothing new or interesting.
Well, what writer would cop to either of those? Of course everything we write is original, unique, surprising!
Let me offer an alternative perspective. “It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.” Uh oh – a cliché, gasp! Also the opening and theme of one of the most loved novels of all time, Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. Austen takes that cliché and runs with it, giving millions of readers some unpredictable and thoroughly entertaining examples of what could go so very wrong within that truism of the early 19th century. She – and she’s not alone, of course – took a cliché and said something new (for her times) and interesting (for all times).
Aside: I’m happy to report my new French village novel, set in a chateau being renovated in Burgundy, is right on schedule to be published in March 2023. Title and cover maybe soon, but so far it's been a great process.
2 comments:
Well put, Susan! Food for thought (cliché, I know).
Jim
Spot on. "embrace something commonplace and then upending it" YES!
If screwing and skewing tropes is good enough for Jane Austen, its good enough for us all. What does that make "Pride and Prejudice and Zombies"? Tropes twice skewered?
Post a Comment