Business -
Overheard at Bouchercon in Florida last month: "I don't write series *or*
standalones; I write books." Do you love/hate/mind/notice/use/ignore the
publishers' and booksellers' classifications of your work?
Well now, isn’t this an interesting one…and something I’ve
been giving a great deal of thought to over the past few months.
I definitely write
two series: The Cait Morgan Mysteries with eight books in it to date; the WISE
Enquiries Agency Mysteries with four books in it to date. Each individual book
within each series has a beginning, middle and end, and I don’t write any
cliffhangers at the end of a book to “encourage” readers to read the next one…I
don’t like it when authors do that to me as a reader, so I don’t do it to mine.
 |
| Definitely a series, all the Cait Morgan Mysteries feature Cait Morgan and Bud Anderson |
Each book has a satisfying conclusion to the case/s within it, and readers can
choose to share the company of my recurring characters again, in another book,
if they choose.
 |
| Definitely a series, each book features the four WISE women, and the inhabitants of both Chellingworth Hall and the village of Anwen-by-Wye |
There can be no doubt that each of the two “sets” of my work
to date is, in fact, a series, as both were planned as such from the start. I
was delighted to work with two different publishers, one for each series, and
we were all pretty certain from the outset that the idea was to bring recurring
characters to books to allow for a “series” to be promoted to readers.
That said, the most recent book I’ve been working on may, or
may not, be the first in a new series. Why don’t I know yet? Because I don’t know
how the book will sell. If it sells well, and if readers want to know what
happens to “some” of the characters within it (I cannot say which ones, because
that would involve spoilers) then I am more than happy to write future books
featuring said character/s. But if there isn’t the appetite for that from
readers then…no, I won’t push it, I’ll allow THE WRONG BOY to become a de facto
standalone (it will be released on January 9th 2019, so if you read
it you can help me make a decision!).
 |
| My new "novel" will be released on January 9th 2019 |
As a reader I enjoy series books, but I also enjoy standalones.
I also am not especially bothered by which it is when I begin to read; I don’t need
to start a series at the first book. If I enjoy a series book I am likely to go
back to the first in the series and work my way forward from there if I have
the time/ability to do so, but I use the library a great deal, so that’s not always
possible.
I don’t mind my books being categorized as series or
standalone…the classifications that bother me more are the “cozy”, “traditional”,
“suspense”, “thriller” type labels that are assigned to books. That’s where I
would say “I am writing a book, not a classification”, rather than railing
against “series or standalone”…which, to me, is a pretty obvious
differentiation.
I'd be honoured if you'd consider reading my work - you can find out about it, and me, here: cathyace.com
9 comments:
"I am writing a book, not a classification." I like that, Cathy. Good way of putting it.
I'm with you, Cathy. I like to read a series, and I like standalones. All that matters is that the writing appeals to me.
Thanks Paul, yes, that is how I feel. However, I have honestly felt, at certain points, that I want to choose to meet the expectations of readers vs publishers.
Yes, Dietrich, I read both...quite happily. Sometimes I read standalones by the same author back to back because their writing so much :-)
Cathy, I'm curious to know why the classifications within the mystery genre bother you. I think people ought to have some sense of what kind of mystery they are picking up. That's why the cover is so important--and that's often where the classification is made clear. Some people love what's known as cozies and are horrified by any graphic violence; others, the opposite. Why not let them know what they are in for before they put down their hard-earned cash? (Or trot him with an armload of books the library). On the other hand, they may be enticed out of their preferences if they get a surprise. Your thoughts?
I'm with you on series. I don't care where I start in a series. I love Deb Crombie's books and have never attempted to read them in order. I like the backstory, but knowing what happened in later books doesn't keep me from getting immersed in earlier books.
Hi Terry - I understand that readers want to know what "classification" of book they're picking up. What I find difficult is when a publisher says "this will be pitched as a cozy series, but it's not cozy enough" when I didn't know I was writing, and didn't want to write, a cozy series/book at all. I understand your point. Good one.
Cathy, in the comment above, you touched on the same issue I had - being pushed into the cozy niche I had not written in, to make the marketing department's job simpler if not more successful. Terry points out that cover art can and should make some basic types clear - no cartoon covers for thrillers, no ultra high tech typeface for historicals. But why do we need further parsing? Let the reader happily browse and figure it out!
Yes, that's the thing, Susan...getting shoehorned into a shoe that doesn't really fit.
I understand what Cathy and Susan are saying--being shoehorned into a genre you don't fit into is stultifying (don't you love that word?) And I agree about browsing as a way of broadening a reader's interest.
Post a Comment